Skip to content
Saturday, October 17, 2026
Prime Bulletin

The Venezuelan Crisis May Now Shape Trump's Legacy - as well as the United States' Position in the World

In the wake of launching a night of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be getting into the nation-building arena.

In a remarkable press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the president stated that US forces had effectively seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then announced that a team featuring Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a safe, orderly and judicious transition," he said.

What precisely "managing the nation" involves is uncertain, but the pledge signifies an dramatic shift in direction for the president, rife with inconsistencies and formidable obstacles.

A president who campaigned against "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US efforts at overthrowing governments and who promised to implement an "America first" international policy is now betting his presidency on effectively revitalizing a South American nation whose economic system is in ruins and whose political stability has been undermined by years of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly upbeat.

He claimed his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this would be no different. He pledged to enlist American oil firms to rebuild Venezuela's crumbling industrial infrastructure, providing capital for the American reconstruction efforts and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out sending American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

A Shift in Foreign Policy

The US has altered Venezuela's prospects – for better or worse.

Trump entered office nearly a year ago promising to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is quite prepared to use military force around the globe.

In the past week, he authorized airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck atomic sites in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike past actions, which have largely involved rockets and warplanes that minimize the exposure of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the fate of that nation – are strikingly different.

His objective, he said during his briefing, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Response at Home and Abroad

That play on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra could be difficult for some of Trump's supporters to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump ally who broke with the president after charging him of deserting his political base, was swift to criticize the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's perpetual military aggression and support of foreign wars is understandable because we are forced to fund it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another notable Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the armed intervention against a "criminal regime" as "decisive and warranted".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his appearance, the president said the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" agenda because it ensured US regional security and provided a steady source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American diplomatic policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Trump Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be challenged again."

The goal of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect commerce, land and assets that are central to our security interests." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's choice to capture Maduro will raise larger concerns in international relations, however, and impact American ties with the world's other major global powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry released a statement voicing surprise and condemning what it said was a reckless attack on a independent country.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar censures of Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often seemed to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, expressed worry about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My main concern is now Russia will use this to justify their illegal and brutal operations against Ukraine, or China to justify an attack of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"The United States should not be running other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have understood by now not to get involved in endless wars and overthrow attempts that carry devastating consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he censured Trump's decision not to inform legislative leaders before initiating the attack.

"The President has the legal duty to follow the law and uphold democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First requires."

Trump, in his press conference, said that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "leak" details of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a triumph – with zero American deaths and limited harm to US assets. Trump, with his typical confidence, portrayed the operation as a "daring raid" and "one of the most stunning, effective and impressive demonstrations of American power and proficiency in American history."

Now he is staking his presidency on that victory enduring, as the US claims it will assume responsibility for running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unclear. He and his team must strengthen a nation that has been in chaos for years while stabilising a hemisphere that is bound to be wary of what Trump's foreign policy has in store for them.

The writer

Sandra Walton

Award-winning journalist with over 15 years of experience covering international affairs and technology innovation.

Prime Bulletin

Type to search articles.